Sprung wrote:I do have to admit to "negative reinforcement" as I like to call it - Roll a Blossoming ancient and two Sunflowers? Expect to wait the entire timer every round and for me to do everything I can to make that game take as long as possible. - These people need to know its not acceptable to roll teams such as these.
Sprung wrote:I dont forfiet because well its lame isnt it? .
Sprung wrote:Dont get me wrong If I know for certain I cannot win in the first round I will sometimes quit. Never to save a few rounds as you put it. You either quit at the start and requeue or you play the whole game. Have some respect for you opponents who come to play and win through pet battling not by default because the opponent rage quit.
Sprung wrote:in fact quiting to save 2 or 3 moves is the worst!.
So you played the whole game and then rage quit because you couldnt win effectivly robbing your opponent of a "win" resulting in a win by default for you opponent. Personally I hate that way of thinking. - Not a great outcome for either party really is it.
Sprung wrote:I would strongly recommend anyone who rolls the teams you all know I am refeering to, re-evaluates their outlook and priorties in life.
Sprung wrote:Some of the adds on this site are malicious. I can provide the code and logs from my AV which detail them as potential harmful. How do I go about reporting this?
You come here complaining about people wasting your time and then you have the nerve to admit pulling this BS? Wow.
Maybe your opponent didn't like your team and they're trying to "negatively reinforce" you from rolling it again.
No, it actually isn't. As Grainne mentioned, in games like chess where you KNOW you can't possibly win (aside from your opponent going AFK), it's actually lame/rude NOT to resign. Again, why waste time? That's what this thread is about, right?
This makes little to no sense to me. How do you know @round 1 if you're going to win or lose?
By the match-up alone? How do you know your opponent isn't a complete novice and has no clue what they're doing? Do you know how many Bone Serpents I've seen using Lift-Off and D&D? Plenty. Never judge your opponent strictly on the pets they've chosen. I use Blossoming Ancient all the time. With Winds and Stun Seed. You might've forfeited against me before the match even started and never have found out though.
Can you please explain this logic to me? (O_o)???
Are you not "rage quitting" (this is a ridiculous and immature phrase btw) when you forfeit a game @round 1 as you've admitted to doing? You ARE "robbing" them of a win after all.
This is a little much, don't you think? Perhaps a deep breath or two would help.
Rosqo wrote:I’m sure everyone has at one point either left a match at round one because they’ve had a bad rng match up.
Sprung wrote:you played the whole game and then rage quit
Sprung wrote:scenario
Player A has 3 Pets alive
Player B has 1 Pet alive (Rabbit)
Sprung wrote:effectivly robbing your opponent of a "win" resulting in a win by default for you opponent. Personally I hate that way of thinking. - Not a great outcome for either party really is it.
I'm probably in minority here, but I think it's rude when people resign.. There should be a penalty (greater than a loss) for resigning and it should increase each time you do it.Biscuit wrote:Sprung wrote:I dont forfiet because well its lame isnt it? .
No, it actually isn't. As Grainne mentioned, in games like chess where you KNOW you can't possibly win (aside from your opponent going AFK), it's actually lame/rude NOT to resign. Again, why waste time? That's what this thread is about, right?
FuxieDK wrote:conceding like a baby!!!
FuxieDK wrote:Granted, I don't really PvP in Pet Battles
Biscuit wrote:FuxieDK wrote:Granted, I don't really PvP in Pet Battles
Interesting. Why are you in this thread then? No offense.
on the contrary! and if you know you lose and quit before the game has lasted longer then 55 seconds I would see a forfit as a tactical move as yes the opponent gets his win but he doesnt get any xp for his toon.Sprung wrote:I dont forfiet because well its lame isnt it? If I left every game where I thought I may not win I wouldnt play very many pet battles.
yep I do that too. I stall them as long as possible - most people seem to give up after ~ 1 hourSprung wrote:I do have to admit to "negative reinforcement" as I like to call it - Roll a Blossoming ancient and two Sunflowers? Expect to wait the entire timer every round and for me to do everything I can to make that game take as long as possible. - These people need to know its not acceptable to roll teams such as these.
Sprung wrote:I would strongly recommend anyone who rolls the teams you all know I am refeering to, re-evaluates their outlook and priorties in life.
Q8e192 wrote:At the very least, if you are on the losing team, you can quit with the same result as a loss.
But its even worse if you are winning and then the losing team AFKs.
Users browsing this forum: Rhoid and 4 guests