h/s or h/p ruby droplet?

Discuss pet battles, strategy and theorycrafting.
Post Reply
User avatar
Sweetdr0ps
Top Rater
Posts:521
Joined:November 3rd, 2009
Pet Score:9135
BattleTag®:Sweetdr0ps#1199
Realm:The Forgotten Coast-us
Contact:
h/s or h/p ruby droplet?

Post by Sweetdr0ps » December 30th, 2013, 5:10 pm

I've seen people using h/p in pvp, claims of the power affecting the heal, but was inclined to go with h/s for the instance of double bubble. thoughts?

User avatar
Kpb321
Posts:938
Joined:April 30th, 2013
Pet Score:3974
BattleTag®:kpb#1554
Realm:Sisters of Elune-us
Contact:

Re: h/s or h/p ruby droplet?

Post by Kpb321 » December 30th, 2013, 5:15 pm

Assuming you are going 2/2/2 I'd go h/h personally. The H/P breed only gets 14 more dmg from h/p vs h/h and Bubble/Drain Blood don't scale at all. The H/S at 289 speed seems marginal on the speed side. It does make bubble a little easier to use for a big hit but since it absorbs two attack I don't know that it is necessary and there are plenty of pets faster than 289 speed.

User avatar
Luciandk
Posts:1293
Joined:February 12th, 2012
Pet Score:3576
Realm:Argent Dawn-eu
Contact:

Re: h/s or h/p ruby droplet?

Post by Luciandk » December 30th, 2013, 11:58 pm

Another vote for H/H. The gain from HP is just too miniscule on Absorb and the other 2 abilities doesnt scale at all.

While HS can give a slightly faster buble in some cases, you have to remember its an 8 turn cd ability and not terribly reliable for defense like the much faster dodge.

With HH you gain more health from Sunlight, which also jacks your Blood Drain through the roof. Ive seen some truly massive heals from Sunlighted Blood Drains, 800+, which works superbly with the extra max health gained. Effectively turning you into a health tank.

User avatar
Sweetdr0ps
Top Rater
Posts:521
Joined:November 3rd, 2009
Pet Score:9135
BattleTag®:Sweetdr0ps#1199
Realm:The Forgotten Coast-us
Contact:

Re: h/s or h/p ruby droplet?

Post by Sweetdr0ps » January 1st, 2014, 6:42 pm

ty both for your valuable input

Post Reply