


Edema wrote:Thats odd cause last word was tuesday may see the hot fix, and i only see a Uncommon Glowfly that you have

Kinski wrote:for me its the other way round, captured/released around 10 - 12 rare glowflies so far.
http://.me/Warcraft#PetBreeds for the breedIDs
but no rare crow so far, and only one uncommon yet.
Misstic wrote:Kinski wrote:for me its the other way round, captured/released around 10 - 12 rare glowflies so far.
http://.me/Warcraft#PetBreeds for the breedIDs
but no rare crow so far, and only one uncommon yet.
Umm that link looks like it takes me to spam??



Moiread wrote:Misstic wrote:Kinski wrote:for me its the other way round, captured/released around 10 - 12 rare glowflies so far.
http://.me/Warcraft#PetBreeds for the breedIDs
but no rare crow so far, and only one uncommon yet.
Umm that link looks like it takes me to spam??
It's not spam, but it's nothing to do with WoW. Not the first time I've seen this 'Competitor' site brought up on here. What is it supposed to be?

Hellomynameis wrote:It seems to be a part of an illegal-link list they have made up. If a resource is too similar and might be used instead of warcraftpets.com, it seems they censor the link so that people wont get the help they need... I know of atleast two sites who gets this threatment, its http:// petbattle arena .com AND http:// schaffhauser .me/Warcraft
..its sad really, to deny a community to share knowledge. If there are other reasons for this thing, I would love to hear it.
...and if sharing this info gets me banned, and this post deleted: It was nice having a chat, take care all. (/hide)
Quintessence wrote:As per WarcraftPets User Guidelines:
Advertising and Soliciting
This category includes:Providing a link to any competing "companion pet" website.
I wish them the best aswell, however some of them have functionality lacking on this site. And while I do understand why they might be hessitant to link to you, since they are fairly new "in the game", I do not understand why warcraftpets.com can't have a list of "similar resources" non-the-less, to help out the community as a whole to achieve what they seek. A resource list deemed worthy of course. A community is for sharing ideas afterall, and when there are censorship like this involved, it cripples the communication/sharing.Quintessence wrote:We've reached out to many similar websites to inquire a possible collaboration, but unfortunately many creators have their own visions for their site in mind. Which is understandable and commendable. We wish them the best!
Thanks for enlightening me, I will refrain from mentioning those two sites again(since its the only I know of atm).Quintessence wrote:While we don't have any ill will or negative feelings towards other "pet websites", please respect our User Guidelines and refrain from linking them on WarcraftPets. Thank you!
Providing a link to any competing "companion pet" website.




GormanGhaste wrote:The censorship leaves a bad taste in my mouth. And I really don't think it's necessary, as neither site specifically mentioned is a threat to Warcraftpets.



Users browsing this forum: Threnody and 1 guest