GormanGhaste wrote:While pet level has a minor effect on the score, pet rarity is much more important. I think the WarcraftPets method of scoring is much better for collectors than what Wowprogress uses.
Stabya wrote:Let me take your thought one step further.
If you have 300 rare pets under level 25, and I had 250 level 25 pets, then I'd think I accomplished more
and I am sure many of you with the sheer number of pets would disagree, and have a right to.
Stabya wrote:If you had 300 Level 1 Rare pets, and I had 275 Level 25 Rare pets, it appears you would have the higher pet score.
Someone can correct me if I am wrong, but it looks like the most points you can get from pet levelling is (4*Avg Level) which is 100 right?
If Levelling pets to the maximum can only get you 100 points if everything was level 25, then "to a lesser extent" is an understatement to pet level factoring in on a total score
Mastr wrote:I would ask that both pet score and total number lists be posted.
Mastr wrote:I think the best way to do it is treat us collectors like they do the pets now on the stats page.
Have columns you can click on to get your ranking. That way you could go for most pets, most at 25, most rares, best pet score, whatever floats your boat. That way you could work on whatever ranking scale you wanted to use.
Heck you could even go for most grey pets or most at level one.