Breanni wrote:Thanks for your suggestions and explanation, Bwana. A system that stays constant would certainly be an improvement over what we have now. And at .04, the math brings the pet level portion of the score in line with the percentage increase we had considered. We'll definitely take it under advisement.
Kpb321 wrote:I think you need to check your math because .04 * total pet level would be ~600 total points for pet leveling while your previously proposed 10 * average pet level would be 250 total points for pet leveling. .02 or /50 would put it closer to the increase you had proposed. His example only ends up being ~300 points because his average pet level is only 14.5.
Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest