Kpb321 wrote:would need to have leveled 250 more pets from level 1 to 25 than you which is no small amount of work.
Voskres wrote:Regardless of all this queep, here is something to think about.
In about a week or so, I will get my other 3 RAF and after Tues I will get my last CT.
This will give me 594 pets, good enough in number to be #278 on the entire site.
Yet the way I figure by your numbers, it would move me about 20 points, to 3285ish, not even moving me up one space from my current ranking on my lowest of low pop servers.
One of the most numerous collections in the entire game and not anywhere near the Top 5 on my own nearly extinct server.
Since a snide remark was thrown as saying 'complainers gonna complain,' it is obvious that many members couldn't get more pets so they wanted a way to increase their score and the only way to do that was to encorporate levels at a higher clip. I don't see their complaining being vilified; I see it being hailed as change. I guess what they say is true - history IS written by the victors.
This was counter-productive to the rest of us who put great emphasis on the actual collection. The ire comes from the fact that you changed the scoring mid-stream and now, it is just a number and not something to try and attain. Before 3000 was like the holy grail and now we have 1000s of people over it, 15 or so on my server alone when we had one person at exactly 3000 before, and there is nothing let to aspire for when you are giving it away.
I am obviously not trying (purposefully) to be a jerk, I just don't appreciate getting dog piled on for speaking my mind. This is EXACTLY why no one else wants to come forth and say anything about it - because website lurkers have a tendancy to jump all over someone speaking their piece.
If you want to condemn me for complaining about a score on a website... isn't that how it got changed in the first place?
Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest