FuxieDK wrote:There are ~700 pets and you have room for 1000. That's ~50% extra.. That should be more than enough for all..
If cap was raised to 1200 or even 1500 as suggested, the cap would be pointless, and thus should be removed.
Rendigar wrote:That is your opinion on what "should be more than enough for all". And obviously, based on the comments of a few people here in contradiction, that is not the case.
Rendigar wrote:The cap could be there for many reasons - including to limit the amount of database space being used to track pets.
Users browsing this forum: Dolz and 6 guests